Who should Complete a Tax Return? Government Gazette, 9 June 2017


In terms of section 25 of the Tax Administration Act, 2011, Commissioner for SARS Tom Moyane promulgated Public Notice 547, which sets out the requirements for which persons how to submit income tax returns for 2017 year of assessment. In terms of section 25 of the Tax Administration Act, read with section 66(1) of the Income Tax Act, persons specified in terms of paragraph 2 of the Public Notice 547 are required to submit an income tax return within the prescribed period in paragraph 4 of the said Public Notice.

As the tax season of 2017 opens in just under two weeks, we shall examine the various categories of persons who are compelled by the Public Notice to submit income tax returns for 2017, as well as other important matters referring to the 2017 filing season.

Who must Submit Income Tax Returns for 2017 Year of Assessment

Both resident and non-resident companies, trusts or other juristic persons, who carried on a trade through a permanent establishment in the Republic, derived income from a source in the Republic, derived any capital gain or capital loss from the disposal of an asset to which the Eighth Schedule to the Income Tax Act applies, every company incorporated, established or formed in the Republic, but which is not a resident as a result of the application of any agreement entered into with the Government of any other country for the avoidance of double taxation, are liable to submit income tax returns for 2017 year of assessment..

All resident and non-resident natural persons, who:

Carried on any trade (other than solely in his or her capacity as an employee);

  • Was paid or granted an allowance or advance as described in section 8(1)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act (other than an amount reimbursed or advanced as described in section 8(1)(a)(ii)) and whose gross income exceeded the thresholds set out in paragraph (4) below;
  • Was granted a taxable benefit described in paragraph 7 of the Seventh Schedule to the Income Tax Act and whose gross income exceeded the thresholds set out in paragraph (4) below;
  • Are residents and had capital gains or capital losses exceeding R40 000, and for non-residents who had capital gains or capital losses from the disposal of an asset to which the Eighth Schedule to the Income Tax Act applies;
  • Is a resident who held any funds in foreign currency or owned any assets outside the Republic, if the total value of those funds and assets exceeded R225 000 at any stage during the 2017 year of assessment;
  • Is a resident who had any income or capital gains from funds in foreign currency or assets outside the Republic;
  • Is issued an income tax return form or who is requested by the Commissioner in writing to furnish a return, irrespective of the amount of income of that person;
  • Is an estate of a deceased person that had gross income;
  • Is a non-resident whose gross income included interest from a source in the Republic and is not subject to the exemptions contained in Section 10 (1) (h) of the Income Tax Act
  • Is a representative taxpayer of any persons are all liable to submit and file income tax returns for 2017 year of assessment.

Who is Exempt from Submitting Income Tax Returns

Natural persons and estates of deceased persons, if the gross income of that person consisted solely of gross income, such as remuneration paid or payable from one employer, which does not exceed R350 000 and employees’ tax has been deducted or withheld in terms of the deduction tables prescribed by the Commissioner, dividends received by, or accrued to natural persons who were non-residents throughout 2017 year of assessment; and amounts received or accrued from a tax-free investments, do not need to file income tax returns. In addition to this requirement, interest (other than interest from a tax-free investment) from a source in the Republic not exceeding:

  • R 23 800 for natural persons below the age of 65 years;
  • R 34 500 for natural persons aged 65 years, or older;
  • R 23 800 for the estates of deceased persons is not subject to income tax.

Natural persons, who have received income not exceeding R 75 000 per year for persons under the age of 65 years; R 116 150 per year for persons older than 65 years, but under the age of 75 years and R 129 850 per year for persons older than 75 years will not be liable to submit and file income tax returns for 2017 year of assessment.

Deadlines for Income Tax Returns Submissions

The periods within which income tax returns must be furnished are for companies within 12 months after the end of the financial year end and for all other persons, which includes natural persons and trusts:

  • On, or before 22 September 2017 for all manually submitted income tax returns;
  • On, or before 24 November 2017 for all income tax returns submitted by using the SARS eFiling platform or electronically through the assistance of a SARS official at an office of SARS;
  • On, or before 31 January 2018 if the return relates to a provisional taxpayer and is submitted by using the SARS eFiling platform.

Forms of Income Tax Returns

The forms prescribed by the Commissioner for the submission of income tax returns are obtainable on request via the internet at www.sarsefiling.co.za or from any office of SARS, other than an office which deals solely with matters relating to customs and excise.

Good luck with the submissions of your income tax returns! We are here to assist you if you need any advice and guidance for the completion and submission of your income tax return, or if you are aggrieved by the assessment received from SARS.

Herewith a link for ease of reference:

Public Notice from SARS in terms of section 25 for submission of 2017 income tax returns, released on 9th June 2017

 

[button url=”mailto:contact@taxconsulting.co.za?subject=Urgent Client Contact Request (Gazette 9 June)- www.taxconsulting.co.za (Latest News)” target=”” size=”small” style=”black” icon=”” popup=”” title=””]contact@taxconsulting.co.za[/button]

 

Tax Residency and Retirement Annuity considerations for Expatriates

Tax Residency and Retirement Annuity considerations for Expatriates

South African expatriates are reeling in response to the proposed changes to the foreign income tax exemption, so much so that many expatriates are investigating whether they can become non-resident for tax purposes. Similarly, expatriates who previously intended to retire in South Africa are now not so sure, and those who have a retirement annuity in South Africa are exploring the option of withdrawing the proceeds of their annuity and taking the money abroad.

With this change in attitude, expatriates should give some consideration as to whether or not they can prove their non-residency and whether they are legally permitted to cash in / withdraw their retirement annuity in a lump sum.

In terms of section 102 of the Tax Administration Act, No. 28 of 2011, the taxpayer bears the burden of proving all tax exemptions, deductions or set-offs, lower tax rates and reductions. In the same vein, it is the taxpayer and not SARS who will have to prove the taxpayer’s residency status.

In endeavouring to prove their non-residency, unfortunately it is not enough for a taxpayer to simply state an intention to be non-resident. The taxpayer will have to show something more, this by pointing to objective factors, such as their work and personal circumstances, which evidence such non-residency.

Although not in the context of residency, but still in considering the correlation between subjective belief and objective, external factors, the 2015 Supreme Court Appeal decision in Anglo Platinum Management Services (Pty) Ltd v C:SARS confirmed that “a court is not concerned with the subjective belief of the parties to the agreement – no matter how genuine that belief may be – but with whether the facts, objectively viewed, establish that this result was attained.”

A taxpayer must therefore prove with sufficient certainty, through a reliance on a significant presence of objective factors, that they are non-resident. In that regard, one factor stands out from the rest and evidences beyond any doubt that the taxpayer intends to become non-resident. This is where the taxpayer has effected a formal financial emigration through the Reserve Bank.

Interestingly, with regard to a lump sum withdrawal of a retirement annuity, the legislature seems to have taken a similar view on proving non-residency by effecting in 2016 an amendment to the Income Tax Act, No. 58 of 1962. The Act now provides that a taxpayer who intends to transfer their annuity abroad, may only do so where they are or were “a resident who emigrated from the Republic and that emigration is recognised by the South African Reserve Bank for purposes of exchange control”.

In conforming to the Anglo Platinum decision, it is therefore insufficient to rely solely on a subjective belief of non-residency for purposes of cashing in a retirement annuity. The taxpayer must objectively validate this belief, this by effecting a financial emigration. This codification of the objective test provides for absolute certainty as to the taxpayer’s residency.

Whether or not a taxpayer intends to withdraw their retirement annuity, effecting a financial emigration should still be pursued. As an attorney, it will always be easier to rebut an assessment raised by SARS where I can point to the taxpayer’s prior financial emigration and resultant non-residency.

Sayonara to Tax Free Earnings

Sayonara to Tax Free Earnings

The proposed amendment to section 10(1)(o)(ii), the exemption section referred to often as the so-called 183-and-60-day rule aims to limit the current tax-free earning situation of South African tax residents working abroad.

Under the current regime, taxpayers who are resident in the Republic and earn an income under a foreign flag, are exempt from paying tax on that income under 183-and-60-day rule. The proposed amendment aims to remove this exemption for taxpayers who are not taxed in the country in which they render their employment services.

There is currently no certainty as to when the proposed change will occur, given that it was announced at the 2017/2018 budget speech by current Finance Minister, Pravin Gordhan and there has, thus far, been no invitation for commentary by the public. More importantly, will the date promulgation of the amendment and the effective date differ? Will SARS apply the change retrospectively as it so surreptitiously did with employee relocation allowances?

In future, on the anticipated law change, an employee will need to prove that the income received for employment services abroad was taxed in the country in which the services were rendered. Without being able to prove this, the employee would not enjoy the benefit of the current tax exemption. On a side note, this will only be in reference to income tax on the employment income and not VAT, dividends tax or corporate tax.

Where the taxpayer remains tax resident, South African expatriates abroad must accept that the days of earning completely tax-free are over. Naturally, with the correct expert advice, avenues can be sought to reduce the impact of this proposed amendment.

Naturally, we await progress with eager anticipation and will keep our clients abreast of any news hereon.

[button url=”mailto:contact@taxconsulting.co.za?subject=Urgent Client Contact Request – www.taxconsulting.co.za (Sayonara to Tax Free Earnings)” target=”” size=”small” style=”black” icon=”” popup=”” title=””]contact@taxconsulting.co.za[/button]

SARS to Exchange Tax Information with over 50 Jurisdictions

SARS to Exchange Tax Information with over 50 Jurisdictions

The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has committed to the automatic exchange of tax information with the revenue authorities of over 50 other jurisdictions under the Organisation for Economic Co-operation & Development (OECD) Common Reporting Standard (CRS) by September 2017.

This international initiative goes hand-in-hand with SARS’ proposal to close the tax net on South African expats, many of whom have simply stopped starting submitting tax returns, completed zero tax filings and / or otherwise not complied with income tax and capital gains tax rules.

Banks will be required to provide to SARS financial information which includes: interest, dividends, account balances, income from certain insurance products, sales proceeds from financial assets and other income generated with respect to assets held in the account or payments made with respect to the account. This links back to South African passports, which create the reporting obligation.

Tax Residence in South Africa or in another jurisdiction will also form part of the CRS disclosure. This may include providing proof of foreign tax residency and, according to Marius Engelbrecht, our lead tax partner on personal tax compliance, we have seen a number of accounts being closed where the taxpayer appears to have been non-compliant.

He recommends the initial step is always to establish your current SARS compliance and according to latest statistics, only between about 25% of expatriates that ask us to check their status are fully up to date and compliant.

Expatriate Tax Compliance for South Africans Abroad – Step-by-Step

EXPATRIATE TAX COMPLIANCE FOR SOUTH AFRICANS ABROAD

STEP-BY-STEP

We have received numerous requests from South Africans working abroad for a step-by-step explanation on what should be done to ensure they are fully tax compliant and optimally planned, especially with the pending tax law change. Please note the below is specifically written for South African expatriates abroad.

Our steps are –

  1. Get SARS diagnostic on compliance history and tax status.
  2. Correct any outstanding returns, zero returns or incorrect tax filings.
  3. Where you have left South African in the past 3 to 10 years with a permanent intention (intention of not coming back), you should seriously consider financial emigration through the Reserve Bank.
  4. Where you have left South African longer than 10 years ago and / or especially where you have no bank account or tax number in South Africa, getting your non-residency status legally confirmed may be a better and cheaper option.
  5. Where you have not left permanently, make sure you have disclosed world-wide income and capital gains, and also claimed the 183-and-60-day exemption correctly.
  6. The new proposed policy change is well lobbied so, we recommend joining such a group to strengthen the cause as there is a good case to make for a less penal law change. An example hereof the “South African Expats Tax Petition Group” on Facebook.
  7. Do not have knee-jerk reactions, i.e. wait for the law change at least in draft format, but from a position of compliance. This will in all probability only apply 01 March 2018 forward and there will be plenty of planning opportunities to pay less tax. We do not foresee anybody paying 45% tax with proper planning.

We note below some more in-depth information for those who are interested –

SARS Status Update (Tax Diagnostic)

We always recommend, as the very first step, for new clients to have a SARS status update done. Call this a tax diagnostic, so we move from tax speculation to your personal tax reality.

One cannot even consider whether there are any risks or your future planning options, where you do not know your tax position, according to SARS records. Where correctly done, this process creates no risk of a SARS audit or opening a can of worms.

Different tax practitioners approach this differently, but we have about 18 points we specifically want to verify. The more obvious ones are whether you have any returns or money outstanding, whether you have a local of foreign address, where the foreign employment income was disclosed, whether you have simply done zero tax returns. This gets more complex as SARS e-filing portal is a very powerful tool, which contains very specific information, or the lack thereof, is often the start to a SARS audit.

Based on our experience, most taxpayers believe everything is completely up to date, and only around 25% of the time everything is indeed all in order.

I Have Submitted Zero Returns

There is a very common misconception that where you are a South African abroad you could simply submit zero tax returns. Where you have simply left to work abroad, this is not only incorrect but also an offense under tax law.

The only case where you legally can submit zero tax returns are where (a) you are verifiable as a non-resident for South African tax purposes, and (b) you have no South African source income.

In all other cases you, need to make complete and correct returns to SARS, and for South African tax residents that means disclosing your world-wide income and capital gains.

If I Disclose My Income Correctly, Does This Mean I Will Need To Pay Tax On Offshore Income

We would like to assess your situation first, but the quick answer is “no”. Whilst you must disclose your employment income, such employment income is exempt where you have met the section 10(1)(o)(ii) exemption requirements. This means you disclose fully but do not need to pay taxes.

But I have a Tax Clearance?

Tax clearances are simply issued to say you have no returns or money outstanding. It does not verify compliance in any way or prohibit a SARS audit.

Have Been Audited, Therefore I Am Complaint

A SARS verification exercise is often confused with an audit. Simply submitting supporting documents does not count as an audit. Also, SARS normally only conducts limited audits, i.e. on a specific technical matter. However, where SARS has legally audited you on a specific item, they are legally prohibited from auditing you again, except where there is, for example, fraud or misrepresentation.

My Accountant Has Been Doing My Returns

There are excellent tax practitioners in the market and on many we simply, and always, have to truthfully acknowledge, that we cannot do better work. Unfortunately, there are many exceptions and even where you have paid for a big brand, there are no guarantees.

We had a case a couple of weeks ago where the taxpayer was adamant the accountant completed returns correctly and that the foreign employment income was correctly disclosed. He was pretty sure, having forked out just over R5,000 per year for the tax service. When we investigated, there was no claim in the tax assessment. We then further delved into the tax returns done and found that zero’s were declared! Thus, R5,000 per year for completing zero’s and filing the tax return incorrectly. This just emphasizes again, you cannot trust blindly and have to always ask the correct questions to not be misled.

How Will SARS Know

Everyone is reported under CRS or common reporting standards. Where you have a bank account, you are reported automatically and your South African passport or address means SARS is informed.

Employment is Critical (Currently)

The section 10(1)(o)(ii) exemption test only works for employment income and which is earned physically outside South Africa. It is therefore critical that you have an employment contract and not a self-employed or independent arrangement. If this has never been asked of you before, the chances are very good your tax return was done incorrectly in the past.

Importance of Passport copies

You can only evidence your absence from South Africa with passport copies. This must be certified. We recommend you make regular copies and scan them, in case your passport gets stolen. Getting for example airport emigration control records does not count. The only exception we have ever seen is for pilots and airline crew, as well as seafarers, where alternative logs are accepted. If this has never been asked of you before, the chances are very good your tax return was done incorrectly in the past.

[button url=”mailto:contact@taxconsulting.co.za?subject=Urgent Client Contact Request – www.taxconsulting.co.za (Step-by-Step Expats)” target=”” size=”small” style=”black” icon=”” popup=”” title=””]contact@taxconsulting.co.za[/button]

Increase of the Scale of Benefits

Increase of the Scale of Benefits

The Unemployment Insurance Amendment Act, No. 10 of 2016 (“the Act”), is aimed at having a positive effect on the country’s labour force. Furthermore, there are likely to be positive effects on the economy as well.

The Act will see those who lose their jobs receive money for a longer period when they apply for unemployment benefits. The UIF benefits have been increased from 238 days to 365 days. A further change here is that employees will be able to apply for benefits over twelve (12) months as opposed to six (6) months as was the situation prior to the amendment.

Some further amendments relate to maternity leave. Expectant mothers were not able to claim maternity benefits because they could not claim until the child was born. This meant that only once the child was born, the benefits could be claimed for and were received upon the mother returning to work. Expectant mothers may now claim eight weeks before estimated due date, which should grant the benefits to the mother when necessary and not post-fact. The maternity benefit has also been increased from 45% of normal pay to 66%.

On 17 March 2017, the Minister of Labour, Mildred Nelisiwe Oliphant amended the Unemployment Insurance Fund scale of benefits contained within Government Gazette notice No. 588. The value of the benefit pay-out by the Fund has been amended. The changes in the amounts are an increase in the per annum rates, from R 178 464 to R 212 539 and an increase in the monthly amount to R 17 712 and an increased weekly amount of R 4 087.

The UIF thresholds were last adjusted in 2012. As a result of the new threshold values that will come into effect on 01 April 2017, these contributions will now increase to up to R 177.12 per month for employees who earn above the previous threshold value of R 14 872 and were capped at a maximum contribution of R147.82.

These changes will take effect from 01 April 2017.

Herewith a link to the Government Gazette notice:

http://www.gov.za/sites/www.gov.za/files/40691_gon231.pdf

Tips for Expatriates – Bringing Money to South Africa

TIPS FOR EXPATRIATES – BRINGING MONEY TO SOUTH AFRICA

We receive many questions from South African expatriates abroad who regularly transfer money to South Africa, to support various costs or investments in South Africa. Some do this monthly and others effect larger transfers on a periodic basis. Whilst we are not a foreign exchange provider, one of our partners are well-known in financial planning circles, being a Certified Financial Planner® and he holds his own FSB License.

I have asked him for some of the most important aspects of transferring money internationally and some of the secrets of foreign exchange –

  1. The most expensive way to transfer foreign exchange is through a normal banking system. This especially applies where you use the same corresponding banks. You may think they give you the best deal, but the quickest way to get thoroughly ripped-off is not knowing how you are being ripped-off.

Contact Donne@taxconsulting.co.za for details on who gives her clients currently the best forex service, including Reuters rate.

  1. Where you transfer money between currencies, there is a “true” exchange rate. This is the rate quoted on Reuters. So, when you want to know how much Rands should really arrive, you must know what is the Reuters or Bloomberg rate. For example, where the ZAR is 10 to the USD (we wish, I know, but for ease of computation purposes), for every USD1 you refer, you will receive ZAR10 in South Africa.
  1. The fact is that no bank gives you the “true” rate. They take a margin and this is called the “spread”. The bank never gives you the best rate. Their spread is often 3% to even 4.5%. Assuming a 4% spread, in our example, the USD1 then only gives you R9.60 in South Africa.
  1. Where you use a forex exchange company, they give you a better spread. Say you get a 1.5% spread, the USD1 then gives you a R9.85. This is achieved as they do bulk buying and selling of currencies, so their rate negotiation is simply much better than what any individual can achieve.

We do not want to make too public where you can for free get the closest to true exchange rates for free, but send confidential request to Donne@taxconsulting.co.za to share the link.

  1. The question is can these companies be trusted and why? We have seen clients using them for years and without fail the transactions are quicker and more secure. The reason is their arrangement is normally with the same bank, as only where you have different corresponding banks money sometimes get delayed over the ocean. As you will be dealing with a household name bank (different ones have different arrangements with different banks), we see this as no risk. Make also very sure you only deal with a registered FSB (registered with the South African Financial Services Board) meaning you have the normal full protection under South African law and full indemnity insurance.
  1. As we are involved with expatriate financial planning, especially tax, we know the significant difference this makes at the end of the day. Getting the cheapest foreign exchange rates are very important for our clients and where you have a provider who offers a secure and better deal, please send through details, as we can always do a quick comparison, so others can also benefit from their service. The key to a good provider is having transparency!
  1. Finally, you may have heard that bringing money into South Africa may have a tax consequence. This is not directly true. Being paid, remitting money into South Africa etc have no tax impact at all. Where does this rumor come from? Blame the Brits – they have a “remittance” basis of taxation for UK residents and domiciles, i.e. where you remit money into the United Kingdom, which you earned outside, this becomes taxable. There is no such South African tax rule and this has never been part of our law.

Please contact donne@taxconsulting.co.za for more information or should you need a review of your personal tax position by international tax experts.

International Tax and Double Tax Agreements 101

The application of double tax treaties may very well find application, and is obviously an important part of international tax planning consideration. This is, however, a complex area of tax and application of rules differ between countries. We often see even local South African tax experts getting this wrong, so please just work with caution and any informal view should always be professionally signed-off. Also, just at a practical level, two initial comments –

(a) Tax treaty relief is something which must be claimed by a taxpayer and SARS must agree thereto. Under no circumstances should anyone, even remotely, assume they can read the DTA, determine they qualify for tax relief, and then close the book to just carry on with life. The use of DTA relief is subject to mutual assistance and agreement procedures. For example, where you are based in the United Kingdom, SARS would ask for a tax residency certificate before considering the DTA. There are very well set protocols to adhere to and the correct process must be followed to make this claim.

(b) When applying a new DTA, such as the one with the United Arab Emirates of 15 December 2016, we would be extra cautionary on relying on its provisions, but that does not mean it is not available. The answer here will be determined by domestic rules and how jacked the UAE Revenue Authority is with tax treaty application at local level. Conversely, we are always sensitive to SARS’ own ability to first-time accurately interpret international tax law correctly. As practitioners who deal herewith daily, my recommendation is to rather use domestic law for planning as SARS is well versed herewith. However, where you are in a corner and claim DTA tax exemption, that may always remain a last resort. Yes, you can fly through a large thunderstorm, but first try and avoid it.

Let’s now deal with the technical application –

1. The treaty only applies to where you are considered tax resident in both the contracting states. This means you need to be not just tax resident in South Africa, but also tax resident in the UAE. The technical reference for this is Article 4(2)(b) of the UAE DTA –

2. What we are unsure off is whether expatriates from South Africa to the UAE are tax resident in the UAE. Please note this is not work permit resident or right to reside, but “tax resident”. The rub will be whether one can get a UAE tax residency certificate, issued by the UAE Revenue Authorities, stating the tax status for purposes of the DTA as same. Let’s assume this hurdle can be overcome.

3. Now you have a position where someone is a South African tax resident under the South African tax law, and a UAE tax resident under UAE law. Tax treaties operate on the very clear principle that you can only be tax resident in one country. This is a founding principle. To address such a conflict, the DTA contains what is known technically as the “tie-breaker” clause. There are certain tests you follow, and as one applies to both countries or neither countries, you go to the next test. Ultimately there will always be a result, and if all tests fail, SARS and the UAE Revenue must negotiate your status under sub-article 4(2)(d).

4. These tie-breaker tests are contained in sub-article 4(2) and reads –

5. Now, I am a bit worried about the self-help readers and the above clause. They read it, [think] they understand the above, and then form an opinion. It is compulsory to acquire the OECD commentary on these tests and study this yourself, as well as case law hereon, before forming your own view. Acquiring the expertise to interpret the myriad factors of consideration impacting and knowing how to apply and challenge takes many years of practical application and practice.

6. But if you want a quick answer, where you do not have permanent residency in a location, i.e. the right to stay indefinitely, the odds are not in your favor to argue that you have a “permanent home”, “centre of vital interests” or “habitual abode” in the UAE. Thus, rather try to fly around this thunderstorm.

7. Where the tie-breaker works against South Africa, you will be non-resident for tax and this means the new rule does not apply to you. However, there will still be a deemed disposal for CGT triggered by this and you will still need to comply with the associated Reserve Bank requirements.

We will share more later on typical solutions under separate cover, as well as possible approached to support a lobby pre-promulgation of the new law.

Update on South African Tax on Expatriate Employees and Various Client Questions

UPDATE ON SOUTH AFRICAN TAX ON EXPATRIATE EMPLOYEES AND VARIOUS CLIENT QUESTIONS / RESPONSES TO SOME SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTARY

The National Treasury announcement of taxes on expatriate employees, where no exemption under section 10(1)(o)(ii) will be allowed where there are not actual taxes paid in the host country, has resulted in considerable comment and debate. We wish to publish this second notice to assist those South African taxpayers who wish to be fully compliant, yet optimally structured, to guide them through the myriad of issues to be considered.

I was once “asked” by a wealthy United States businessman what he is missing with the South African taxpayer public. In the United States, he mentioned, no one will ever talk socially about not paying their taxes or doing anything remotely wrong. You never know who is listening. He was bemused that in South Africa there is open talk and bragging about not paying one’s taxes; as if SARS criminal auditors cannot access Facebook groups and cannot see posts, years from now. In the United States they at least have a strong tax paying culture, so if you do not pay your share, society turns on you. Arguably we are far from this in South Africa, but if you have been naughty and feel the desperate need to tell the world, perhaps one should consider that if someone does not like you, they can always do a SARS tip-off through a simple website form.

Therefore, please approach with caution the comments by various self-proclaimed tax journeymen, and whilst there are many half-truths doing the rounds, some views are simply dangerous and others so clueless that one only hopes that no-one will stake their livelihood on these views. One may guess anyone who has cheated the taxman somewhere can put themselves out as a charlatan, but that hardly makes their opinion worth following.

Some quick thoughts on posts –

SARS cannot find me, so I am ok

Well actually nothing can be further from the truth. Google FATCA and CRS, as well as see the activated agreements at http://www.oecd.org/tax/automatic-exchange/international-framework-for-the-crs/exchange-relationships/#d.en.345426. Select South Africa in the receiving drop down menu to see who is sending the data to South Africa. This is off course only the start, as Mauritius and other international locations are all joining.

Offshore tax evasion has become a growing concern worldwide, and governments and financial institutions have become much more aware of the large amounts of undisclosed wealth held in offshore accounts. In an effort to combat tax evasion the global version of the United States’ Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), known as the Common Reporting Standard (CRS), came into effect in South Africa on 1 March 2016. CRS is the global standard for the automatic exchange of financial account information and extends to all accounts held by entities and individuals with foreign tax obligations and entities with controlling persons who have foreign tax obligations.

Therefore, they do not care so much where you are, but more where your bank account is located. Your South African passport triggers the global reporting, which ends up with SARS. Granted, the wheels of the law turn slowly. But you may have already been reported, thus you need to make sure your ducks are in a row. Actually, this is exactly the reason for the SARS Special Voluntary Disclosure Programme which is currently active and running.

SARS have accepted my non-disclosure, so I am in the clear

Where you have not made full and correct disclosure on your personal tax return, there is no prescription. This means SARS can open this years from now and assess you correctly, with penalties and interest.

The automatically generated SARS assessment does not mean you have passed verification; and even where you have been verified, you have not been audited. Where you have been audited, you would know you have been audited, as this is a painfully intrusive process.

SARS will need to prove my status and that I am at fault

Unlike criminal law, in tax law you are guilty until you can prove yourself innocent. This is called the “onus of proof” requirement  – see section 102 of the Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011. Most tax court cases are lost in South Africa as the taxpayer cannot discharge the onus of proof.

This is why, as tax professionals, we have difficulty in explaining tax planning requirements and documentary processes to clients. The question often asked is where does it say I “must” do this. The answer is, nowhere. Where you cannot defend your tax position adopted on a balance of probabilities, the tax case will go against you.

SARS lacks capacity and competence

This may be true, so you may be correct, for now. However, just because you committed theft 20 years ago, does not mean you are pardoned. Some of our most complex tax cases we have had to defend, dates to events 10 to 15 years ago, often sins of the forefathers, which caught up with the next generation. SARS may be a bit weak now, but they will rise again and head-hunt the skills and expertise to audit backwards. It is on these cases where 200% penalties come into play and if you have not seen the TAA compulsory penalty chart, please let us know and we will do a post.

The tax law change will only come into play in two years

Would you like to bet something, to have skin in the game? SARS needs to urgently collect more taxes. Do you know of any tax law amendments announced in the National Budget process, which was not implemented in the same year, some retrospective, some from date of promulgation and, at best, 01 March [2018] onwards?

There is nothing one can do now, before the law is not implemented

This is a view, but probably not a good view. If you want to claim non-residency status and have not done this correctly, it is a no-brainer that sooner is better. If you have been submitting no returns, it would be a good idea to catch-up now, simply being a compliant taxpayer makes sense at various levels. Where you have done incorrect (zero) tax submissions, you are high risk and should regularize.

There is of course plenty more which can be said, but I will allow comments to run for a while, before responding again. Need to do some real work as well. My next post will be on the actual recommended steps which should be considered to be optimally planned.

International Tax and Transfer Pricing

On 28 October 2016 SARS published, in the Government Gazette, a notice under section 29 of the Tax Administration Act, No. 28 of 2011 which requires of selected multinational enterprises who enter into certain transactions to keep, what is effectively, a transfer pricing policy.

In terms of the notice, information required to be kept in respect of selected persons and transactions include:

  • Copies of any contracts or agreements related to the potentially affected transactions entered into by the person with each connected person, if such contracts or agreements were prepared in the ordinary course of business;
  • The comparable data and methods considered and used for determining the arm’s length return and the analysis performed to determine the transfer prices or the allocations of profits or losses or contributions to costs, as the case may be, in respect of the potentially affected transaction;
  • A description of the person’s ownership structure, with details of shares or ownership interest in excess of 10 per cent held by the person or therein by other persons as well as a description of all foreign connected persons with which that person is transacting and the details of the nature of the connection;
  • an organogram showing the title and location of the senior management team members;
  • the person’s market share within the industry, analysis of relevant market competition environment and key competitors;
  • Copies of existing unilateral, bilateral and multilateral advance pricing agreements and other tax rulings to which SARS is not a party and which are related to the potentially affected transactions.

While the notice does not communicate any requirement to disclose the information to SARS if not specifically called upon to do so, it has been announced on 22 February 2017 that multinational enterprises will, by 31 December 2017, be required to disclose country by country transfer pricing reports to SARS.

In the advent of international exchange of financial information and the international focus on base erosion and profit shifting, the measures taken by the SARS come as no surprise. Multinational enterprises are advised to ensure compliance with the international fiscal regulatory requirements.

Tax Consulting South Africa’s international tax team consists not only of tax experts but also of attorneys, chartered accountants and benchmarking experts who are well qualified and experienced in the idiosyncrasies associated with international tax structuring, transfer pricing and regulatory framework. Not only do we assist with ensuring compliance with the above mentioned notice but also provide valuable guidance on day to day tax implications attached to operations and which, in the current international tax climate is equally, if not more important than merely having a compliant transfer pricing policy. Gone are the days where transfer pricing policies are locked away and dusted off upon enquiry from SARS or every three years for review. A dedicated international tax task team to mitigate risks is a prerequisite for multinational enterprises who requires growth amidst the increased red tape associated with doing business across borders.